![]() Mar 8th 2022 AMD Isolates Windows 11 and Windows 10 Performance Stuttering Issues to fTPM (81).Mar 8th 2022 AMD Said to be Releasing no Less Than Four New Ryzen 5000-Series Chips in March (137).Apr 16th 2020 AMD Ryzen 4000 Series "Vermeer" CPUs to be Compatible with B450 Motherboards (58).May 24th 2022 AMD Unveils 5 nm Ryzen 7000 "Zen 4" Desktop Processors & AM5 DDR5 Platform (209).And this happens, again, despite the 9590 running at 4.7 GHz base and 5 GHz boost, whilst having a TDP rated at 125W more than the 1700X. This, allied to the 1700X's use of SMT with its 16 logical threads, also helps put into perspective how AMD managed to achieve a 111% boost in the multi-threaded score compared to the FX 9590 (1537 on the 1700X, 728 on the FX 9590). The 1700X at 95 W TDP scores the vaunted 40% more in the single-threaded test than AMD's FX 9590 running at 5 GHz and at 220 W (!!) TDP, with 154 points against the FX 9590's tiny 110. Whether you think this variability favors AMD's 1700X or Intel's 6900K in this particular scenario, there is one thing variability can't account for: the 55 W difference between rated TDP on AMD's 1700X (95 W) and Intel's 6900K (140 W).Īnother thing that can't (apparently) be denied is the enormous leap in performance compared to AMD's now defunct Bulldozer architecture (and later refinements). We also can't forget how the test systems differ in terms of memory specs and all those other small things, which still end up affecting the final score. ![]() Some comments: AMD's 1700X achieves virtually identical scores to Intel's 6900K CPU on both tests (loses slightly on the multi-threaded test, but eeks out a win on the single-threaded one) once you take variabilty into account.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |